Peterson Ex Rel. Peterson v. Fowler
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ELLETT, Justice:
The plaintiffs are the dependents of Carl John Peterson, deceased. The Industrial Indemnity Company is the compensation insurance carrier for Peterson’s employer and would be entitled to reimbursement in case plaintiffs recover in this action. Robert A. Fowler was the architect on the job on which the deceased was working at the time he lost his life. Lauren Burt, Inc., was an independent subcontractor furnishing and installing ceiling tile in the dome of a sports arena. The deceased worked for the general contractor, and his dependents are receiving an award pursuant to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. HamblySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Pool v. Southern Pacific Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1899
- Murray v. Wasatch Grading Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1929
- Cook v. Peter Kiewit Sons CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1963
- Daniels v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bambrough v. BethersUtah Supreme Court · 1976
- Michaels v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
- Michaels v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
- Krieger v. J. E. Greiner Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Young v. Eastern Engineering & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.