Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Union Pacific Railway Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1890PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the district court of the .third district and from an order refusing a new trial. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackbubn, J.

This is a suit by a brakeman, an employe of the defendant company, for an injury to him while in the line of his duty on a train that was wrecked. He was severely injured, and permanently in one leg and one of his shoulders, so as to be unable to perform manual labor. The evidence tends to show that the train on which the plaintiff was at work as brakeman was wrecked by a broken wheel; that *358there was an old crack in the wheel, which could have been seen by proper inspection; and the question was fairly submitted to the jury, and they found that this was negligence in the defendant company. We…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. KellyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pool v. Southern Pacific Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Peterson Ex Rel. Peterson v. FowlerUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Andreson v. Ogden Union Railway & Depot Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Malola Pool v. Southern Pacific Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Dryburg v. Mercur Gold Mining & Milling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1898

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API