Legal Opinion

Larson v. Mulcrone

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 1, 1982No. 81 C 4197PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Plaintiff Arthur J. Larson brings this pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 asserting the jurisdiction of the Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3). Alleging violations of his federal constitutional rights, he seeks declaratory, injunctive, and-monetary relief from defendants Lawrence Mulcrone, investigating agent for the Illinois Department of Law Enforcement (“IDLE”); Max Fritschel, deputy director of the IDLE; and Donald Shiflet, a retired correctional captain at the Stateville Correctional Center. Before the Court is the motion to dismiss…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Martinez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Meyer v. RenoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
  2. Tumery Mathews v. James W. Fairman, Warden, James Thieret, Assistant Warden, and Louis O'shea, Clinical Services SupervisorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Watts v. MorganDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
  4. Cooper v. ElrodDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  5. Siddiqi v. LaneDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API