Larson v. Mulcrone
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Plaintiff Arthur J. Larson brings this pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 asserting the jurisdiction of the Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3). Alleging violations of his federal constitutional rights, he seeks declaratory, injunctive, and-monetary relief from defendants Lawrence Mulcrone, investigating agent for the Illinois Department of Law Enforcement (“IDLE”); Max Fritschel, deputy director of the IDLE; and Donald Shiflet, a retired correctional captain at the Stateville Correctional Center. Before the Court is the motion to dismiss…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Martinez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Meyer v. RenoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Tumery Mathews v. James W. Fairman, Warden, James Thieret, Assistant Warden, and Louis O'shea, Clinical Services SupervisorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Watts v. MorganDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- Cooper v. ElrodDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Siddiqi v. LaneDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.