Legal Opinion

Blake Ex Rel. Adams v. Spartanburg General Hospital

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 13, 1992No. 23554PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

The primary issue before this Court is whether the trial judge erred in granting respondent Leneace Blake (Blake) a new trial on the grounds that a bailiffs comments may have influenced jury deliberations. We affirm.

I. FACTS

Blake underwent coronary bypass surgery in 1987 at Spartanburg General Hospital. She allegedly was administered an excessive amount of potassium. She experienced cardiac arrest while in the operating room, but was resuscitated. Blake thereafter brought a medical malpractice action, alleging she suffered brain damage as a consequence of the cardiac arrest,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hanselmann v. McCardleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  2. Davis v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  3. Zorn Ex Rel. Estate of Zorn v. CrawfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  4. Campbell v. PaschalCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Nickles v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Parker v. Evening Post Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Perez v. Community Hospital of Chandler, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. CameronCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019
  5. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API