Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Rebsamen Ins., Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 4, 1997No. 97-14PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.

This is a tort case in which the appellant, O’Neal Wilson, sued the appellees, Rebsamen Insurance, d/b/a Insurisk Insurance Services, and Jim Moor-head, for injuries he sustained while working for his employer. The trial court granted the appellees summary judgment because it ruled that they were immune from suit under the exclusive remedy provision of the workers’ compensation statute, and because they did not owe a duty of care to Wilson. We disagree with both of these rulings, and accordingly we reverse and remand.

Insurisk Insurance Services, a company…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Blessing v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Patentas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  3. Shannon v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Roy Griffin Davis v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a Massachusetts Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. Ouachita Wilderness Institute v. MergenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Yanmar Co. v. SlaterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  2. Henry W. Boerner, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Mary Jane Boerner, Deceased v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  3. Branscumb v. FreemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Wilson v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Peredia v. HR Mobile Servs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API