State v. Howiler, 06-Be-69 (3-17-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Ruth A. Howiler, appeals from her conviction in the Belmont County Court, Western Division, for operation of a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OVI). Howiler alleges that she was denied effective assistance of trial counsel. She first argues that counsel failed to present a witness, and second, that counsel failed to preserve for appellate review the trial court's decision on the motion to suppress.
{¶ 2} On July 27, 2006, Patrolman Chappell (Chappell) stopped Howiler for driving a vehicle with a loud exhaust system. When Chappell approached Howiler's window,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. EndicottOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
- In Matter of Barnhart, 12-07-13 (4-14-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008