Legal Opinion

State v. Howiler, 06-Be-69 (3-17-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 2008No. Case No. 06-BE-69PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Ruth A. Howiler, appeals from her conviction in the Belmont County Court, Western Division, for operation of a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OVI). Howiler alleges that she was denied effective assistance of trial counsel. She first argues that counsel failed to present a witness, and second, that counsel failed to preserve for appellate review the trial court's decision on the motion to suppress.

{¶ 2} On July 27, 2006, Patrolman Chappell (Chappell) stopped Howiler for driving a vehicle with a loud exhaust system. When Chappell approached Howiler's window,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. EndicottOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
  2. In Matter of Barnhart, 12-07-13 (4-14-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API