Legal Opinion

In Matter of Barnhart, 12-07-13 (4-14-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 2008No. 12-07-13Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant John Barnhart Jr. ("Barnhart") brings this appeal from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Putnam County, Juvenile Division adjudicating him as a delinquent after he was found guilty of rape. For the reasons discussed below, the judgment is affirmed.

{¶ 2} On May 1, 2007, Barnhart was indicted on one charge of rape with a specification that he qualified as a serious youthful offender. The charge was based on the fact that the victim was a young woman with mild to severe mental retardation. The relationship between the victim and Barnhart came to light…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CassanoOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. CassanoOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. Bridge, 1-06-30 (4-16-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. In Matter of Redmond, 1-06-90 (6-25-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. Howiler, 06-Be-69 (3-17-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API