Legal Opinion

Whitehawk v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1991No. 18471PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Lyle Whitehawk appeals from the district court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. Whitehawk raises three issues on appeal. First, Whitehawk argues that the district judge abused his discretion by sentencing him to a lengthy sentence. Second, Whitehawk contends that I.C. § 20-223 constitutionally requires that, as a convicted sexual offender, he receive psychological care and treatment in order to enhance his opportunity for parole. Lastly, Whitehawk asserts that the Idaho State Board of Correction failed to comply with statutory requirements for a psychological…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of Corrections, Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. State v. HoisingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Baldner v. Bennett's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Balla v. Idaho State Board of CorrectionsDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1984
  5. Whitehawk v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cowan v. Board of Com'rs of Fremont CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Gabourie v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State v. HadleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State v. OsborneIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Bell v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API