Legal Opinion
State v. Osborne
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided June 10, 1997No. 22726PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PERRY, Judge.
Kameryn D. Osborne appeals from his judgment of conviction for rape. I.C. § 18-6101(5). Osborne claims that he was provided ineffective assistance of counsel at his trial, that the district court failed to suppress an illegally obtained statement, that the prosecution failed to disclose exculpatory evidence and that the evidence presented was insufficient to support a guilty verdict. We affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
Osborne and Emily Carmona were introduced on March 12, 1995. Osborne, Carmo-na and a group of friends drank throughout the evening of the twelfth and the morning of the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. YagerIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. HauserIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. Hamlin - Sexual abuseIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
- Cooke v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.