Philip Carey Manufacturing Co. v. Joseph Rugo, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.
This bill in equity was brought to obtain the benefit of the bond given by the defendants, Joseph Rugo, Inc. (Rugo), and two insurance companies, as the statutory security required by Gr. L. c. 149, § 29, as amended through St. 1957, c. 682, § 1. The plaintiff (Carey) was a supplier of a subcontractor under a contract of September 18,1959, between Rugo and the Massachusetts Port Authority 1 for the construction of a hangar at the Logan Airport. Carey was a supplier of insulating material to S. D. Shaw & Sons, Inc. (Shaw),AAe"heating and ventilating subcontractor.
Rugo has appealed from…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Long Island Painting Corp. v. Beacon Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
- Carroll Hunnewell, Inc. v. Southboro Construction Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
3Cited by4 opinions
- AMERICAN AIR FILTER CO. INC. v. Innamorati Bros. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- John W. Egan Co. v. Major Construction Management Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Powers Regulator Co. v. Joseph Rugo, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Milano Bros. v. Joseph Rugo, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968