Carroll Hunnewell, Inc. v. Southboro Construction Corp.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
Section 29 of Gr. L. c. 149, as amended through St. 1957, c. 682, § 1, provides, in part, that “In order to obtain the benefit of ... [a statutory security bond] the claimant shall file . . . with the contracting officer or agent in the ease of a contract with the commonwealth ... a sworn statement of his claim prior to the expiration of ninety days after the claimant ceases to . . . furnish . . . appliances and equipment . . . for which claim is made.” In this bill to enforce a claim under § 29 the sole question is whether the plaintiff filed a “sworn statement of his claim.” In other…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cook Borden & Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Jackman v. City of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Valentine Lumber & Supply Co. v. ThibeaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
3Cited by5 opinions
- JP Smith Co. Inc. v. Wexler Construction Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Powers Regulator Co. v. Joseph Rugo, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Di Fruscio v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Philip Carey Manufacturing Co. v. Joseph Rugo, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
- Microwave Associates, Inc. v. Antenna Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965