Legal Opinion

Joyner v. Glimcher Properties

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 27, 2002No. 3526Published

1Opinion of the Court

356 S.C. 460 (2002)

589 S.E.2d 762

Thomas C. JOYNER, Respondent,

v.

GLIMCHER PROPERTIES and Smith Land Resources, Inc., Defendants, Of whom, Glimcher Properties is, Appellant.

No. 3526.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Heard June 5, 2002.

Decided June 27, 2002.

Scott A. Seelhoff, of Howell, Gibson & Hughes, of Beaufort, for appellant.

Paul H. Infinger, of Dukes, Williams & Infinger, of Beaufort, for respondent.

GOOLSBY, J.:

Following a jury trial in magistrate's court, Thomas C. Joyner received a verdict against Glimcher Properties in the amount of $2,500.00. Glimcher appealed to the circuit court.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Plum Creek Development Co. v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Willimon v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  4. Small v. MungoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  5. Godwin v. CarriganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API