Tevis v. Wilke, Fleury, Hoffelt, Gould & Birney, LLP (In Re Tevis)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
BUFFORD, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Appellants Larry and Nancy Tevis (“the Tevises”), appearing pro se, appeal the bankruptcy court’s decision (“Memorandum Decision”) granting attorneys fees and expenses to Wilke, Fleury, Hoffelt, Gould & Birney, LLP (“Wilke Fleury”) for its services as counsel to the former chapter 7 3 trustee. The Tevises make two main contentions in support of their appeal. First, the Tevises dispute that Wilke Fleury satisfied the disinterestedness requirement to qualify it to receive compensation from the estate. Second, the Tevis-es claim that the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Deparment of Corporations. v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Kelly Koerner v. George A. GrigasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- In Re RobertsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1985
- Flatt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Bernard P. Rome v. Joseph Braunstein, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- AFI Holding, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Dye v. Brown (In Re AFI Holding, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- In re Cabe & Cato, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
- In Re Kobra PropertiesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2009
- In re Sundance Self Storage-El Dorado LPUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.