Legal Opinion

Young v. Clayton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 25, 1954No. 5-228PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This is a representative suit brought by the appellant against the State Treasurer and the State Auditor. The plaintiff is the owner of refunding bonds issued under Act 4 of 1941 (Ark. Stats., 1947, Appendix to Title 13, p. 773) and sues on behalf of all the bondholders. The theory of the complaint is that Act 4 pledged certain highway revenues as security for the payment of the refunding bonds, that this pledge constituted a contract between the State and its bondholders, and that the contract has been impaired by the Revenue Stabilization Law of 1945 and subsequent legislation. Ark. Stats.,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fulkerson v. Refunding Board of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  2. County Board of Education v. AustinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  3. Scougale v. PageSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  4. State Ex Rel. Hillsborough County v. AmosSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  5. Davis v. Pensioners Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chandler v. Board of Trustees of the Teacher Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  2. Hooker v. ParkinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  3. Magnolia School District No. 14 v. Arkansas State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Chandler v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF TEACHER RETIRE. SYS.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  5. City of Jacksonville v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API