Legal Opinion

Fulkerson v. Refunding Board of Arkansas

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 17, 1941No. Nos. 4-6356 and 4-6364 (consolidated)PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is the third attempt by the state to refund its outstanding bonded road indebtedness by the issuance and sale of bonds for that purpose since the renditions of the opinion of this court in the case of Scougale v. Page, 194 Ark. 280, 106 S.W.2d 1023, delivered June 14, 1937. The opinion in the case of Matthews v. Bailey, Governor, 198 Ark. 703, 130 S.W.2d 1006, delivered July 10, 1939, recites the facts relating to the first attempt which was made under the supposed authority of acts 130, 151 and 278 of 1937 and of act 257 of 1939. It was held that these acts did not confer the authority…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Murphy v. TownsendSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  2. Wheat v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  3. Oates v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  4. Harrington v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  5. Cox v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. McArthur v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  2. Halbert v. Helena-West Helena Industrial Development Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  3. Starnes v. SadlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  4. Beaumont v. FaubusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  5. Fletcher v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API