Legal Opinion
United States v. Martin
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 13, 1959PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge.
Defendants Kantor and Appelbaum apply, pursuant to Rule 41(e), F.R.Crim.P., 18 U.S.C., to suppress evidence consisting of furs, packages of furs and the wrapper from a mailed package seized at the loft premises of Kantor and Appelbaum, Inc., at 305 Seventh Avenue, New York City, on September 6, 1958. 1 Kantor and Appelbaum, Inc., is a manufacturing furrier. Kantor is president, and Appelbaum is secretary-treasurer of the corporation, and, as individuals, they are co-lessees of the premises.
The testimony at the hearing held on this application 2 is in…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Elliott Kahaner, Antonio Corallo and James Vincent KeoghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Ernest T. PageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- State v. KingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- United States v. BonannoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Pueblo v. Seda AlvarezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.