Legal Opinion

Marr v. Putnam

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1958PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKester, J.

This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment for plaintiffs in an action of libel.

The case was previously in this court after a non-suit had been granted. In Marr v. Putnam, 196 Or 1, 246 P 509, the judgment of nonsuit was reversed and the cause was remanded for a new trial. The case was tried again on the same pleadings, and plaintiffs’ evidence on the second trial was substantially the same as on the first trial. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiffs in the amount of $4,000, upon which the judgment was entered from which this appeal is taken.

In view of the full discussion in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marr v. PutnamOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State v. MasonOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Wayne v. HuberOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Public Market Co. of Portland v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Finn v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United Medical Laboratories, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. Sheedy v. StallOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Huszar v. CERTIFIED REALTY COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. Hutchison v. SEMLEROregon Supreme Court · 1961

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API