Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Marquette & Pacific Rolling Mill Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1875PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cooley, J:

The, plaintiff sues the defendants for breach of a contract whereby as ho alleges he was employed by them as dock superintendent at their works at Marquette. The contract is alleged to have been made August 8, 1872, for one year from August 14, 1872. Plaintiff entered upon the employment on the day last named, and was discharged January 1st, 1873.

To prove the contract, plaintiff gave in evidence certain oral negotiations between Mr. IT. A. Burt, the agent of defendants, and himself, in which lie proposed to enter the service of defendants at two thousand dollars a year, and Mr. Burt…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Abell v. MunsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Hall v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Paul v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. First Nat. Bank of Wilkes-Barre v. BarnumDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. Morris v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  4. Benedek v. Mechanical Products, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Aall v. Riverside Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API