Legal Opinion

Prichard v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 2, 1935No. Civ. No. 10064PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOMB, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from an order taxing costs.

The questions presented for determination are:

First: Is the successful party entitled to have taxed as items of cost, mileage and per diem of a witness who attends a trial in response to a subpoena which has been delivered by a deputy county clerk to an attorney, signed and sealed, leaving blank (a) the title of the cause, (b) the name of the witness, and (c) the date of trial, which omissions are supplied by the attorney prior to service of the subpoenaf

Second: Where a number of witnesses are subpoenaed by defendant and appear…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. Southern Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Marshall v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Snowball v. SnowballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Whitaker v. MoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Randall v. FalknerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Santa Ana v. City of Garden GroveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. TRACKMAN v. KenneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. California Motor Express, Ltd. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Islamic Republic of Iran v. PahlaviCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Allen v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API