Legal Opinion

Bakaisa v. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railroad

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 23, 1942No. Appeal, No. 127PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

This workmen’s compensation ease began with the filing on October 22, 1938 of a claim petition averring that the claimant was injured on January 12, 1937, while in the course of his employment as a machinist helper. The description of the accident and injury in the claim petition was: “Hurt right knee, by hammer missing chisel.”

The defendant, in its answer, denied that the claimant, while in its employment, received any injury to his right knee, or otherwise, on January 12, 1937 or thereabouts, or that he had hurt his knee while in its employment. It averred that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Walsh v. Penn Anthracite Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Zionek v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Young v. Dept. of Public Inst.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Coder v. Pittsburgh Desmoines Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Tomshuck v. Wallin Concrete Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kline v. KiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Apker v. Crown Can Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Mancuso v. MancusoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Schuch v. Harbison's Dairies, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Baur v. Mesta Machine Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API