Legal Opinion

In Re Park

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 18, 1976No. Crim. 8802PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRIEDMAN, J.

Petitioner filed a petition for habeas corpus in the state Supreme Court. That court issued an order returnable before this court, directing the People to show cause “why petitioner’s now expired term for violation of Penal Code section 459 . . . should not be redetermined pursuant to In re Rodriguez, 14 Cal.3d 639 [122 Cal.Rptr. 552, 537 P.2d 384], and the commencement date of the consecutive term for violation of Penal Code section 245 ... established in conformity therewith.”

In October 1960, petitioner was convicted of second degree burglary, an offense carrying an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re ShullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. In Re CowenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. In Re HaygoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In Re ByrnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. SavalaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. People v. LobaughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. People v. SavalaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API