Legal Opinion

State v. Mendonca

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1985No. 10192; CRIMINAL NO. 2919PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HAYASHI, J.

Defendant-Appellant Dwayne Nelson Mendonca (hereinafter “Mendonca”) appeals from convictions for attempted first degree robbery (HRS §§ 705-500 and 708-840(1 )(b)(i)) and attempted murder (HRS §§ 705-500 and 707-701). Mendonca contends he was subjected to double jeopardy when Plaintiff-Appellee the State of Hawaii (hereinafter “State”) indicted and prosecuted him for two crimes arising out of the exact same facts when the evidence indicated he was guilty of only one crime (attempted robbery). We disagree and affirm the convictions based on the reasons stated…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. Alfred Joseph SamangoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. State v. ModicaHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. HowesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. CastroHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. RuggieroHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. Ah ChoyHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. WongHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. ChongHawaii Supreme Court · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API