Legal Opinion
Eipp v. Jiminy Peak, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided July 25, 2001No. Civ.A. 00-30114-KPNPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WITH REGARD TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 2J)
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Jason Eipp (“Plaintiff’), his wife and minor daughter (collectively “Plaintiffs”) bring this negligence action against Jiminy Peak, Inc. (“Defendant”), the operator of a ski area where Plaintiff was injured on January 24, 2000. Defendant, asserting that the suit is barred by the Massachusetts Ski Safety Act, Mass.Gen.L. ch. 143, §§ 71H-71S, moves for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the court will deny Defendant’s motion. 1
I. SUMMARY JUDGMENT…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- National Amusements, Inc. v. Town of DedhamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Wilfredo Martinez, A/K/A Wilfredo Martinez Rodriguez v. Rafael Colon, A/K/A Rafael Colon PizarroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Dana Blackie v. State of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brush v. Jiminy Peak Mountain Resort, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- Peresypa v. Jiminy Peak Mountain Resort, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- Grajeda v. Vail Resorts Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2023