Commonwealth v. Hunt
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Judge:
Appellant was convicted of possession of heroin 1 in a non-jury trial. His only contention is that the court below erred in denying his motion to suppress the heroin introduced against him at trial. Because we agree with appellant’s argument that the heroin was obtained in an unlawful search of appellant’s person, we reverse and grant a new trial.
Our function on review is to determine whether the record supports the suppression court’s factual findings and the legitimacy of the inferences and legal conclusions drawn from those findings. In making this determination, we consider…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Commonwealth v. KichlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. HicksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Commonwealth v. E.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. TrengeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. MistlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. DanielsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.