Legal Opinion

Pat v. Mult. Sch. Dist. 1

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 27, 2000No. UP-72-96 CA A101623Published

1Opinion of the Court

16 P.3d 1189 (2000)

171 Or. App. 616

PORTLAND ASSOCIATION OF TEACHERS and Denise Poole, Petitioners,

v.

MULTNOMAH SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, Respondent.

(UP-72-96; CA A101623)

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted March 15, 1999.

Decided December 27, 2000.

Paul B. Gamson, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Smith, Gamson, Diamond & Olney.

William H. Walters, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Miller, Nash, Wiener, Hager & Carlsen, LLP.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and BREWER, Judges.

LINDER, J.

Petitioners Portland…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Transportation Management Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Exchange Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API