Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bullard Gin & Mill Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 30, 1922No. 2655PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

(after stating the facts as above). The question for decision is: Did the court err in construing the policies of insurance in evidence as not covering the Bullard Gin & Mill Company’s employees who were employed to work in its business of making boxes and crates? It was for the court to construe the insurance policies and to determine the meaning of the clauses involved, and the court did not, it is believed, err in construing the same-as he did. There are two distinct obligations upon the insurance • company by the terms of the policy: One to secure payment of the compensation to the…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Barron v. Standard Accident InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. GoodnatureSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Employers' Indemnity Corp. v. FelterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Mulkey v. Traders & General Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. American Employers' Ins. Co. v. HookfinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API