Legal Opinion

American Employers' Ins. Co. v. Hookfin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 4, 1930No. 9471PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

The learned trial court filed these conclusions of fact and law, as in support of its judgment in this cause:

“1. I find that Joe Hookfin on and prior to the 7th day of January, 1929, was an employee of Moller and Roberts and was earning a wage of 40⅜ per hour and that said sum was the usual and customary wage paid to an employee of that class in Harris and Galveston counties, Texas, and that the average weekly wage of said employee and that class of employees during the whole year was the sum of $23.08 per week and that 60% of said sum is the sum of $13.80 per week.
“2. I find that said Moller…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American Employers' Ins. Co. v. SingletonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  2. Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. BehnkenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Georgia Home Insurance v. JacobsTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bullard Gin & Mill Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. BoudreauxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Barron v. Standard Accident InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  5. Associated Employers' Reciprocal v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API