Legal Opinion

Rowe Manufacturing Co. v. Curtis-Straub Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 15, 1937No. 43753PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStiger, J.

In May, 1933, the parties entered into a written contract for the sale by the plaintiff to the defendant of a No. 723 Ro-Way Novelty Box. The contract contained no express warranties and provided that "no conditions, agreements or stipulations, verbal or otherwise, save those mentioned above, shall be recognized. ’ ’ Plaintiff brought this action for the purchase price. The defense to the action is:(1) That the defendant was induced to sign the contract by false, fraudulent representations of the plaintiff;(2) That the defendant had no knowledge of novelty boxes and especially the Ro-Way box…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ideal Heating Co. v. KramerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. City National Bank of Auburn v. MasonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  3. Hughes v. National Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  4. Blaul v. RobySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Hogan v. McCombs Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hardman v. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  2. Lamasters v. SpringerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  3. Rasmus v. AO Smith CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1958
  4. Miller v. Economy Hog & Cattle Powder Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  5. Marxen v. MeredithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API