Legal Opinion

Hogan v. McCombs Bros.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 11, 1921PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Marshall District Court. — B. F. Cummings, Judge. Defendants’ motion to strike certain parts of tbe petition was sustained, and the plaintiff appeals.' —

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

— 1. The original notice was served upon defendants on March 4, 1919. The petition was filed on March 6, 1919, and an amended and substituted petition in November following.

i. fbavd: fact (?) In so far as the allegations of the petition are material on this appeal, it states that, until about the time of the transaction in question, plaintiff was a resident of Iowa Falls, and that defendants, a copartnership, are residents of Marshalltown; that plaintiff owned a farm worth, above incumbrances, $13,000; that the. defendants were the owners of a livery, dray, and transfer business in Marshall-*652to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hetland v. BilstadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. McKay v. McCarthySupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. Mattauch v. Walsh Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Birks v. McNeillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  5. Mullen v. CallananSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Falcon Equipment Corporation and Mary Louise Faltico v. Courtesy Lincoln Mercury, Inc., and Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  2. Commercial Savings Bank v. KietgesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Caveman Adventures UN, Ltd. v. Press-Citizen Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  4. Creamer v. StevensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  5. Huffmaster v. TolandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API