Legal Opinion

One Chrysler Roadster v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 21, 1929PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWest, J.

This is a forfeiture and condemnation proceeding instituted on behalf of the Commonwealth against one Chrysler Roadster, Engine No. G-136876, and R. E. Stuart, its owner. Upon a plea of not guilty oh behalf of the Chrysler Roadster and the petition and answer of R. E. Stuart, the jury returned a verdict releasing the automobile. On motion of the Commonwealth, the court set the verdict aside and entered judgment against the Chrysler Roadster, forfeiting the same for *511the use of the Commonwealth and dismissing the petition of R. E. Stuart, the owner.

The plaintiffs in error contend that the court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The United States v. La VengeanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1796
  2. Baird v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1797
  3. Kirkland v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  4. Carey v. State Ex Rel. AlmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Landers v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dixon v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  2. Washington v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
  3. Quidley v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  4. Commonwealth v. MalbonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  5. Lehman v. HarveyOhio Court of Appeals · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API