Kirkland v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. Frederick D. Fulkerson, Judge. The right conferred under the act of 1899 (P-12) to a day in court before the destruction of the property contemplates that a day shall be fixed for hearing the cause, of which defendant shall have notice, at which time he shall have the right to be heard by himself or counsel, and to make his defense. 58 Ala. 599; 43 Am.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. Frederick D. Fulkerson, Judge. The right conferred under the act of 1899 (P-12) to a day in court before the destruction of the property contemplates that a day shall be fixed for hearing the cause, of which defendant shall have notice, at which time he shall have the right to be heard by himself or counsel, and to make his defense. 58 Ala. 599; 43 Am. St. Rep. 525; 14 Utah, 293; 66 S. W. 345; 49 Me. 285; Black, Intox Tiq. 365, 366; 80 Mo. 91; 90 Me. 57; 40 la. 95; 47 la. 418; 49 la. 351. Criminal intent in such a case was a question for a jury. Wells, Law &…
1Opinion of the CourtBattle, J.
A proceeding was instituted under an act entitled “An act to suppress the illegal sale of liquor and to destroy the same when found in prohibited districts,” approved February'13, 1899, section 1 of which, so far as it is necessary to set it out in this opinion, is as follows: “It is hereby made and declared to be the duty of the chancellors, circuit judges, justices of the peace, mayors and police judges, on information given or on their own knowledge, or when they have reasonable grounds to believe that alcohol, spirituous, ardent, vinous, malt or fermented liquors, or any compound or…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Eilenbecker v. District Court of Plymouth CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Wheat v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
- Littleton v. FritzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Rose v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Texas Liquor Control Board v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Riggins v. District Court of Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Limon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Campbell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.