Quidley v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Virginia
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtSpratley, J.
Earl Quidley and Herbert Clanton were, on the 5th day of April, 1949, in the Police Court of the city of Norfolk, convicted of the violation of an ordinance of that city declaring it to be unlawful for any person in that city “to conduct, operate, manage or promote, or be concerned in or take any part in conducting, operating, managing or promoting any lottery, raffle, numbers game # *."
On April 16, 1949, the attorney for the Commonwealth filed in the Corporation Court of the city of Norfolk an information against a Hudson sedan automobile, Virginia license No. 166-287, Motor No. 4844738, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bowie v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
- Boggs v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1882
- Landers v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- One Chrysler Roadster v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
- Duty v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bryson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970
- Roy v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
- Riggan v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
- Brame v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
- Parr v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.