State v. Timley
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 120,414 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. CORTEZ TYRELL TIMLEY, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Prosecutors are given wide latitude in crafting both opening statements and closing arguments, but the inferences prosecutors draw from the evidence must be reasonable. 2. A prosecutor's allegedly erroneous statement must be evaluated in light of the context in which it was made. 3. A district court must exercise discretion in determining whether evidence submitted by a witness, lay or expert, is supported by sufficient foundation. 4. Under the facts…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- State v. PlummerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. BlevinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
- State v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
- State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
- State v. J.L.J.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2024
- State v. ValdezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.