Legal Opinion

Rugee v. Hadley Products, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1952No. 5253PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Chief Justice.

William F. Rugee, plaintiff below, has appealed from the judgment of the lower court sitting without a jury, awarding him $2,750 against only the defendant Sam H. Reed and specifically denying him recovery against the other defendant, Hadley Products, Inc. Defendant Reed did not appeal from the judgment entered against him.

Briefly the facts are that on January 10, 1947, Reed sold to the Hadley Products, Inc., certain oil refi'nery equipment for $5,500, receiving $2,500 in cash, and simultaneously Frank Hadley, president of the corporation, executed and delivered to Reed a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Price v. GurneySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Difani v. Riverside County Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Henry G. Davis & Co. v. GemmellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
  4. Eggers v. National Radio Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Fitzwater v. National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. City of NogalesArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Mitchell v. ThorneArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Mitchell v. ThorneArizona Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API