Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Thorne

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1952No. 5427PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Chief Justice.

Raymond O. Mitchell, plaintiff (appellant) sued Niblack Thorne, defendant (appellee) for $7,500 on an alleged oral contract to repurchase one thousand shares of the capital stock of Hadley Products, Inc., an Arizona corporation. The defendant’s answer specifically denied there was such an agreement and also pleaded as an affirmative defense that if such an agreement was found to exist it was unenforceable because of the statute of frauds. The case was tried to the court, sitting without a jury, which made findings of fact and conclusions of law and then entered judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pierce v. RothwellWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Joy v. PagelMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Beckroge v. South Carolina Public Service Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  4. Rugee v. Hadley Products, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mitchell v. ThorneArizona Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API