Legal Opinion
In re Bejasa
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 9, 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent Mario L. Bejasa, Jr. was admitted to the practice of law in New York by the Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department, on February 9, 1983. At all times rele*398vant herein, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the first Judicial Department.
Petitioner Departmental Disciplinary Committee seeks an order striking the respondent’s name from the role of attorneys, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b), upon the ground that respondent has been automatically disbarred, because of his conviction of a Federal felony which, if committed within…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- In re SilverblattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- In re BeitlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- In re PerlmutterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- In re SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
4Cited by6 opinions
- In re MarilaoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re SprecherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re KnollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re LevitasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re ZumboAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.