Cossack v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.
Alexander Faerstein conducted a retail clothing store and haberdashery in San Bernardino, Cal. On December 26, 1930, he consulted with the defendant-appellant, an attorney, as to Faerstein’s financial difficulties. As a result of that conference, it was decided to execute an assignment for the benefit of Faerstein’s creditors, which was done ,on that same day. Faerstein brought his books with him to the appellant’s office, where they remained from December 26,1930, to January 2, 1931.
The defendant-appellant, as member of the firm of Cossack & Krumm,, mailed out a form…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Phillips & Colby Construction Co. v. SeymourSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Minner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Hartzell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Metzler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. Herbert L. Caudle, Jr., United States of America v. Russell Jack Hawke, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.