Legal Opinion
Teamsters Cannery Local 670 v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 1, 1988No. Nos. 85-7413, 85-7478PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, Circuit Judge:
The question we must answer in this case is whether the record contains substantial evidence to support the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) finding that Teamsters Cannery Local No. 670 (Union) violated express provisions of a strike settlement agreement prohibiting discriminatory retaliation against financial core members when it denied those that crossed a picket line the opportunity to use facilities open to them prior to the work stoppage.
I PERTINENT FACTS
Stayton Canning Company Cooperative (Stayton) and Agripac, Inc., (Agripac) (collectively employers) own…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- National Labor Relations Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bukove v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991
- Teamsters Cannery Local 670 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988