Legal Opinion

United States v. Aluminum Co. of America

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 15, 1939Published

1Opinion of the Court

CAFFEY, District Judge.

Since the adjournment yesterday I have examined all the papers referred to by counsel having or claimed to have a possible bearing on the admissibility of the deposition of Otto Mueller against certain of the defendants. I have also read all pertinent portions of the minutes to which my attention was called. I have likewise searched for authorities having to do with the application of old Equity Rule 47, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723, and of the three new Rules of Civil Procedure mentioned in argument, namely, 26 (d), 31 (a) and 86, 28 U.S.C.A. following section…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Bondholders Corporation v. McClinticCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  2. C. F. Simonin's Sons, Inc. v. American Can Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. McCrone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  4. Sorenson v. SutherlandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API