Legal Opinion
Sorenson v. Sutherland
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 30, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODDARD, District Judge.
This is a motion by the Attorney General of the United States to vacate the final decree entered herein on the 30th day of December, 1929, for the plaintiffs on the ground that the court was without jurisdiction of the suit because it was riot a suit cognizable under the provisions of the Trading with the Enemy Act, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix § 1 et seq., and was not otherwise properly within the jurisdiction of •this court.
The suit was against Howard Sutherland, then Alien Property Custodian, and Frank White, then Treasurer of the United States, in their official…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Windsor v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Company v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jackson Ex Rel. United States v. Irving Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- American National Bank & Trust Company of Chicago, as Trustee, Etc. v. Joseph M. Taussig, Ruth Saxelby v. Joseph M. TaussigCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- Sorenson v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- United States v. Irving Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939