Legal Opinion

Miles v. Althoff

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 3, 1985No. C6-85-300Published

1Opinion of the Court

373 N.W.2d 655 (1985)

Leonard MILES, et al., Respondents,

v.

Peter J. ALTHOFF, Appellant.

No. C6-85-300.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

September 3, 1985.

Review Denied November 1, 1985.

Richard H. Breen, Brainerd, for respondents.

Paul Wendlandt, Jr., Crosby, for appellant.

Considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J., and SEDGWICK and NIERENGARTEN, JJ., with oral argument waived.

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Respondents brought this action to obtain compensation for erection of a partition fence. Fence viewers had ordered appellant to erect the fence, and he failed to do so. Appellant claimed that he had not…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Minneapolis v. WurteleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. McClay v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Pickerell v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  4. Davis v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Miles v. AlthoffCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API