Legal Opinion

Farmers State Bank of Russell v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 1, 1990No. C9-89-1787PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAROLD W. SCHULTZ, Acting Judge. *

Appellant Western National Mutual Insurance Company challenges a judgment obligating it to reimburse Farmers State Bank as the loss payee on an insurance policy. The trial court found that an insurer is entitled to rescind the policy coverage as to the insured but is obligated to contin ue coverage for the loss payee who is innocent of any misrepresentations.

PACTS

LeRoy Steenhoven repairs and resells vehicles. His nephew, Jeff Steenhoven, offered to purchase a repaired 1986 Ford Ranger pickup prior to commencing his duties with the Air Force in Alaska.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Howard v. Aid Ass'n for LutheransSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Allen v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Nielsen v. Mutual Service Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. American National Bank & Trust Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bast v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Commerce Bank v. West Bend Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  3. Northwestern National Casualty Co. v. Khosa, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Date Street Capital, LLC v. Clearcover Insurance Company ...Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2023
  5. Ryan v. City of Coon RapidsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API