Legal Opinion

Commerce Bank v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 22, 2014No. A14-247PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REYES, Judge.

The district court granted summary-judgment in favor of respondent insurer, which denied coverage to appellant bank, the mortgagee and an additional insured, based on an exclusion from coverage for vandalism damage if the insured property remained vacant for more than 60 days. On appeal, appellant bank argues that the district court erred by not applying Minnesota law, which establishes that a mortgagee cannot be denied payment based on the mortgagor’s acts or neglect under a standard mortgage clause. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

This insurance-coverage dispute arises from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Quade v. Secura InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Mahowald v. Minnesota Gas Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Magoun v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  5. Allen v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Old Second National Bank v. Indiana Insurance CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  2. Old Second National Bank v. Indiana Insurance CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  3. Commerce Bank v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Company, [AMENDED]Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API