Carlos Matienzo Roman v. Mariano Acosta Velarde
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Chief Judge.
This action, which might seem to be barred by the statute of limitations, 1 poses a question of subject matter jurisdiction because the district court dismissed on that ground without reaching the limitations issue. Plaintiffs sue the government under the Federal Tort Claims Act for damages on account of its occupation, under an allegedly invalid deed, of certain land claimed to belong to them. 2 From the court’s holding that the government had not consented under the FTCA to suit, and consequent dismissal of the complaint, plaintiffs appeal. Concededly the district court…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Josefina Najarro De Sanchez v. Banco Central De Nicaragua, a Foreign Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Cyrus R. Ware v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. DrinkwaterDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1977
- Oak Forest, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Clark v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.