Legal Opinion
Oak Forest, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 26, 1991No. 90-102LPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action for the taking of real property. Individual plaintiffs (“Wards”) and Oak Forest Inc. are present or former owners of land in a subdivision in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina known as Oak Forest. Third-party plaintiff, Peoples Federal Savings and Loan Association of South Carolina (“Peoples”), holds mortgages on parcels of land in Oak Forest. Plaintiffs claim that the United States, acting *92through Myrtle Beach Air Force Base, has taken the use and value of the subdivision through a series of actions, beginning with the erroneous assertion of title to a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Malone v. BowdoinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. MottazSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Maniere v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Hage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Northrop Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Hage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.