Legal Opinion
Cowden v. Wild Goose Mining & Trading Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 7, 1912No. 2,096PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The intervener holds a receiver’s certificate, similar to that Lfid by the plaintiff Cowden, and seeks similar relief, and upon the same grounds. They therefore occupy precisely the same position.
The plaintiffs contend that the judgments in cases numbered 1,570, 1,571, and 1,573 are void, on the ground of fraud in the indebtedness upon which they were founded, and because of lack of service of process therein upon an accredited agent of the Campion Mining & Trading Company. The service, as has been seen, was made upon one William A. Gilmore, who pretended to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Union Trust Co. v. Illinois Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Miltenberger v. Logansport Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Wallace v. LoomisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Ludlow v. RamseySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Chicago v. Prima Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Lankenau v. Coggeshall & HicksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- In re Seward Dredging Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Herman v. SineyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
- Collins v. Pacific Underwriters, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.