Legal Opinion
Collins v. Pacific Underwriters, Inc.
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided July 23, 1962No. A-2-61PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGE, Chief Judge.
The sole question to be determined in this cause is whether or not a judgment creditor acquires a lien upon personal property attached in the possession of a third person which takes precedence over the claim of a receiver appointed subsequently to the attachment to moneys belonging to or owing to the judgment debtor. The facts are:
On March 30, 1962, a writ of attachment was issued in the above-entitled' court and cause against Pacific Underwriters, Inc. This writ was served by a Deputy U. S. Marshal on April 19, 1962, by handing to and leaving a true and correct copy of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Penn Central Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. SchnaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Riehle v. MargoliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- In re Hall & Stilson Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of California · 1896
- CTC Inv. Co. v. Daniel Boone Coal CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1931
- Lewis v. BirdseyOregon Supreme Court · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lankenau v. Coggeshall & HicksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Herman v. SineyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
- John C. Lankenau, Esq., as Receiver of Lester D. Brown, D/B/A L. D. Brown Co. v. Coggeshall & Hicks, Applicant-Appellee. This Case Came Up on Appeal Under the Style SEC v. Brown, That Used in the District Court. Upon Request, However, the Case on Appeal Has Been Renamed, as Indicated. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lester D. Brown, D/B/A L. D. Brown Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965