Legal Opinion
King v. Jones
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 7, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
47 N.J. Super. 279 (1957)
135 A.2d 873
CATHERINE KING AND CHARLES KING, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THOMAS JONES AND NORMAN W. STOTT, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 4, 1957.
Decided November 7, 1957.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.
Mr. Joseph Butt argued the cause for appellants.
Mr. William K. Miller argued the cause for respondent Thomas Jones (Mr. Albert M. Neiss, attorney).
Mr. John F. Ryan argued the cause for respondent Norman W. Stott (Messrs. Ryan & Saros, attorneys).
GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.
This is an action for damages by Mr. and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Vadurro v. Yellow Cab Co. of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Haid v. LoderstedtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Riley v. WeigandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Petrone v. MargolisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Bowman v. Central R. Co. of NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sokolay v. EdlinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Tabor v. O'GRADYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Aliulis v. Tunnel Hill Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Bechefsky v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Ambrose v. CyphersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958