Legal Opinion
Bechefsky v. City of Newark
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 11, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
59 N.J. Super. 487 (1960)
158 A.2d 214
CELIA BECHEFSKY AND JACOB BECHEFSKY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
THE CITY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 8, 1960.
Decided February 11, 1960.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and FREUND.
Mr. James E. Abrams argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Vincent P. Torppey, Corporation Counsel, attorney; Mr. Jacob M. Goldberg, on the brief).
Mr. Samuel H. Nelson argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Sidney Swirsky, attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hager v. WeberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Hartpence v. GrouleffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Harpell v. Public Service Coordinated TransportSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Moskowitz v. HermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Saco v. HallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chatman v. HallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- NEW JERSEY PAYPHONE ASS'N v. Town of West New YorkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Araujo v. NJ Natural Gas Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Chatman v. HallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992