Legal Opinion
Foley & Williams Manufacturing Co. v. Bell & Harrell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 18, 1908No. 1137PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Certiorari, from Grady superior court — Judge Spence. March 3, 1908.
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
The plaintiffs in error were the plaintiffs in a certiorari. The certiorari bond was signed: “Foley & Williams Mfg. Co. (L.S.), per S. A. Eibola, Treasurer; also by its attorneys at law, Bicketson & Hale (L.S.), United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (L.S.), by its' attorney in fact, T. H. Parker, (L.S.) f and the corporate seal of the guaranty company was attached. In the superior court a motion to dismiss the certiorari, for lack of a sufficient bond, was sustained; and the plaintiffs in certiorari bring error.
*4481. The defendant in error seeks to sustain the judgment on two grounds: (1) that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- American Investment Co. v. Cable Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- New York Life Insurance v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Southern Express Co. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Solomon's Lodge No. 1. A. F. M. v. MontmollinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- Ager v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
3Cited by12 opinions
- Minchew v. Nahunta Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Anderson v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Head v. WaldrupSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Bass v. Masters & AgeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Mantovani v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.